This post is part of a synchroblog initiated by Julie Clawson. Julie and I ended up being roommates when we both spoke at Urbana this past December. You can check out all the other posts at her blog or over at the facebook page.
Synchroblog intro:
What is emerging in the church?
What good things are growing that we can celebrate?
Who are the diverse voices that are now leading the church into the 21st century?There has been a lot of chatter around the interwebs lately regarding how the church emerging in this 21st century is a mostly white male phenomenon. On one hand, there is good reason for this discussion. Many of the bestselling authors and rockstar speakers still happen to be middle-class white guys with Evangelical roots, and it is easy to assume that the most visible players define the whole. Nothing against privileged white guys with big platforms, but most of us know that they are not the sum of (or the core of) what is stirring in the church these days. In fact, their voices are in truth no longer the dominant voices as those of us who were previously marginalized in the Western church world (for one reason or another) are now defining the conversation regarding the church’s future. Our gender, our race, our orientation, our theological or socioeconomic background can no longer by any stretch of the imagination be reason to silence us. We are bringing our knowledge and perspectives from the margins to help guide the church forward. It isn’t something we hope to achieve someday, it is what is happening now. We are the emerging church. We are the voice of the church.
One might wonder why I’d want to weigh in on this kind of synchroblog here at BTG. Our desire to foster safe and spacious conversations around the intersection of faith and sexuality is not limited to those who might find themselves in an emergent church. But what is wonderful about Julie’s questions is their openness – this is not just tied to the emergent movement – but it is a question to anyone who connects as a follower of Jesus with others stumbling and staggering along in this journey of faith. That openness is both something to celebrate about what is emerging in the church – and a reason to jump in and engage.
So, as a Canadian who’s daring to throw my two cents worth into an American conversation, I want to begin by identifying the increasing global nature of the conversations. This diversity is often hugely challenging and stretching. Voices have different experiences, priorities, and comfort zones. But what is emerging, in my experience, is language and capacity to navigate difference with increased generosity, less freak-out, at times enlarged patience, and more robust humility. These virtues give me hope for what is continuing to evolve at the global level of conversation. Particularly, given the fact that the regular topic of this blog – diverse sexual identity – currently raises such tension and conflict in the global conversation ….. I have to keep banking on the hope that generosity, patience, and humility will mark the way forward. Since I believe these are deeply resonant with the character of Christ – I must hope that the church will recover these characteristics as it continues to move forward in a global and diverse conversation.
As has been identified by other contributors, marginalized voices are emerging in the gathering of God’s people. We perhaps typically think of gender, race, orientation, or income level in this regard – and I think there are examples of each of these categories – which give cause for much celebration. Given my work through New Direction, I’m grateful for the voices of those outside the heterosexual mainstream who are active participants in being the church together. However, I want to raise another voice from the margins – the voice of our children. Increasingly, I see a recognition that our children are not the church of tomorrow …. they are the church of today. There is an awareness of giftings and discernment on the part of our children that are welcomed equitably as we communally listen for God’s leading. What a wonderful way to grow us in humility. It is also interesting in our particular area of engagement as we consider kids coming out at younger ages, the voices of gay youth speaking up in the church. How can we encourage young people who find themselves outside the heterosexual mainstream to be active participants in listening for and speaking out God’s call to the church in our current context? Or what about youth with gay friends who are challenging the church to get their priorities in shape when it comes to questions of inclusion, hospitality and unconditional acceptance and love? What I hope continues to emerge is a willingness to break down the assumptions that our kids can’t yet contribute – because we deeply need their voices in the conversation.
Before I get too long winded, I would also want to quickly point to those engaging in the conversation with multiple minority identities – and the immensely valuable contribution they have to offer to the wider conversation and journey of calling the church to continue to emerge into a fuller expression of the way of Jesus. What of the non-white, young female who is deaf and outside the heterosexual mainstream? Do you know her? Have you listened to her story? Have you heard the shape of faith experienced through her journey? What of the transman recently arriving in your community, fleeing from a place of persecution? Do you know him? Have you listened to his story? Do you offer opportunity for his story to be told with those who gather as your church?
I celebrate that those who have dared to rethink, dared to face their anxieties and reconsider long-held assumptions and certitudes, are so often a people of action as well as contemplation. So, I celebrate the tangible expressions of hospitality, for stories shared, for lived stretched and challenged by the ‘other’. I celebrate pints of beer drunk with those with very different paradigms – in a spirit of inquisitive exploration. And I celebrate that the Incarnate One smiles every time the circle widens.

Letter 2.
I think the islands of refuge will grow larger, and mega churches will increase in size. They will have greater money and greater radio or TV. It will not matter, for the ‘new shoppers’ will shrug and go elsewhere to meet their need of dialog and engagement. I think my generation (I’m 54) is still holding on to an isolationist view (of the world; of the church) and therefore, the mega churches will do well until my generation is done dying and giving their estate to the mega churches.
But I watch the next generation. They need engagement (they cannot just sit and listen – they must engage and use their gifts); they need dialog and debate (the sermon appears too one-sided); they need to know a church that has ministries of mercy (to the homeless, the prisoner, the sick, the hungry/thirsty/naked); they need a place where deep honesty can occur without rejection.
Oh, I see I forgot the fourth concept. But in a way, it is too late – the non-virtual church has practiced a censure of honesty so deeply and for so long, that facades and ‘acts’ are required for gaining and maintaining entry. Those that love the ‘act’ will continue to ‘perform’ in the mega churches, in my opinion. But those that crave honesty, to be ‘heard’ even if they are no longer ‘struggling’ nor want to struggle, that crave the very deep healing that comes from honest confession of sins… well, they have left the non-virtual church, and live on the Internet already.
“Hi, my name is FireChief24. I am really attracted to a woman that is not my wife. Has this happened to anyone in a church before?” And 3 people answer ‘affirmative’, and share their stories… and experience healing to one degree or another. Granted, FoxN and Markie59 and TurtleMvngFast responded… but they were honest and rejected no one.
I read that ‘to the one that is hungry, even that which is bitter tastes sweet’. Tough proverb. Ugly truth. Many are hungry for engagement, dialog/debate, ministries of mercy, and honesty without rejection – even if the virtual church cannot meet all needs and is ‘bitter’ in some respects, it now tastes sweet.
Can we prove ‘church shopping’ is ‘bitter’? – sure. Can we prove submission is more mature than dissent? – sure. Can we prove face-to-face is more healing than virtual confession? – sure.
Too late. My children’s generation is not just hungry – it is starved. I can only hope they eat the Bread of Life and the Words of God… but there are many ‘bitter’ philosophies being offered… and they must eat something soon.
All the above is, of course, my opinion. I have no prophecy from our Lord concerning what is emerging. I have only observations…. others perhaps think quite differently.
Much love in Christ always and unconditionally; Caryn
Thank you Caryn for sharing these thoughts. I resonate with what you’ve shared for sure. I think we’re all challenged with the reality that so much of our sense of community can happen online with all of the inherent limitations of that. I just listened to a very interesting conversation between a British post-modern type follower of Jesus and a Christian man from Nigeria …. and the African man was talking about how in the African context people don’t have choices the way Westerners do …. and the impact of this lack of choice is demonstrable in their spirituality and how they navigate the need for certainty in their faith. I found it very interesting – given the breadth of choice I have in my life on nearly every level – and how much that impacts my faith. I would find it difficult to move into a context with no choice – but it might seem that my African brothers and sister have a difficult time imagining being in our context with the plethora of choice. All the more reason, we need to posture ourselves in a place of humility, ready to listen to one another in the global conversation, and be enriched by one another – even when it is uncomfortable and we encounter things we really disagree with.